Defense Parties In Zoloft Lawsuit Claims On Suicide Attempts

By Author: SM Phillips.
Total Articles: 4
Comment this article

The Zoloft lawsuit claims is brought under the theory of manufacturer’s product liability; Pfizer has put the drug on the market and maintained it there without effectively providing sufficient warnings despite the reasonably risks if the antidepressant is used without proper monitoring of the patient for suicidal tendencies.

The Zoloft lawsuit claims is brought under the theory of manufacturer’s product liability; Pfizer has put the drug on the market and maintained it there without effectively providing sufficient warnings despite the reasonably risks if the antidepressant is used without proper monitoring of the patient for suicidal tendencies. The Zoloft lawsuit claims should prove that Pfizer has been aware of relationship between antidepressant usages to the increased suicide attempts, but they opted to downplay the side effects by manipulating the analysis to indicate that the drug was safe and effective. The Zoloft lawsuit claims should also touch on the failure of the drug to be approved to treat anything else than obsessive-compulsive disorder in children; Pfizer has constantly maintained that the ...
... drug is safe and effective for treating depression in pediatric patients. All these facts and many others can be used by the lawyer to assist in establishing product liability in the Zoloft lawsuit claims against Pfizer.

The next party to be enjoined in the Zoloft lawsuit claims is the doctor who gave the prescription of the drug. Many medical studies done since the early 1990s show that there is a definite link between the Zoloft medication and other antidepressants to the increase in suicidal thoughts, actions, attempts, and eventual completions. Any doctor who is updated must have been conversant to the Zoloft lawsuit claims of these studies thus taken precautionary measures to efficiently monitor the patient to whom they had prescribed the antidepressant. In any case the doctor should be sued for negligence; not striving to protect his patients. In most cases the suicide attempts would not occur if the patient had been properly monitored and alternative treatment sort in case suicidal tendencies were suspect. Despite the drug manufacturer concealing the information on the dangers, the doctor is liable in the Zoloft lawsuit claims case.

The other possible defendant in the Zoloft lawsuit claims case is the pharmacist who filled or sold the prescription for antidepressant. The lawyers should argue that the pharmacist refused to adequately warn the patient of the possibility of increased suicidal thoughts, actions and possible suicide attempts in addition to birth defects. The pharmacist’s defense attorney may argue that it is the doctor’s obligation to determine appropriateness to prescribe the drug and to monitor the patient rather than the pharmacist. Enough preparation and arguments must be made in the lawsuit to hold this party liable.

The party that most people forget to enjoin in the Zoloft lawsuit claims cases is the Food and Drugs Agency (FDA). With an experienced lawyer, the FDA can also be held liable to the payments of the damages caused by the antidepressant. The argument against it on behalf of the government is for failing to investigate the truth about the antidepressant in spite of many complains about its side effects and failure to ban the drug from use. The body has in the past banned many drugs on similar grounds thus this should not be an exception. FDA should have done its own tests to ascertain the truth of the claims made by Pfizer to protect the citizens.
Resource: http://www.zoloftlawsuitsettlements.com/