Dogs Are Bad For The Environment?-00-4887

By Author: chuck
Total Articles: 4351
Comment this article

Trying to justify what's wrong with this planet will never happen. We ruined it. We destroyed it. We are not decent human beings. So, why don't we blame everything else and kill innocent animals? How about we all just go back to the stone age? That might help, no more cars, no more gas bills, no more electric, no more pollution. I figured out the solution, without trying to kill my dog.

Trying to justify what's wrong with this planet will never happen. We ruined it. We destroyed it. We are not decent human beings. So, why don't we blame everything else and kill innocent animals? How about we all just go back to the stone age? That might help, no more cars, no more gas bills, no more electric, no more pollution. I figured out the solution, without trying to kill my dog.

In the news today is a headline about dogs polluting the earth.

It is said that the area dogs walk in decrease biodiversity. Thier faeces cause very high bacterial levels in streams and rivers, which makes water unsafe to drink, and that kills the waterway of oxygen killing aquatic life. Dog faeces isn't as toxic as a cats, and if you're a ...
... person that flushes litter down the toilet, you're infecting animals with toxoplasma gondii, which can cause a brain disease.

Owning an animal can be extravagant just because of the thier carbon footprint. The article then goes on to tell us about how we should eat dogs and cats. We should own pets such as hens because they lay eggs. A rabbit is also good, only is you eat them though. Then they close thier statements with saying that making sure your animal has a dual purpose and that would be the best way for compensating for that paw/clawprint.

About the Author:

http://www.stateyourbeef.com/Forum/

Provider http://www.stateyourbeef.com/