ALL >> Insurance >> View Article
Flooding: The Risks For Design Consultants

Managing Risk
As far as possible a structured approach should be taken to minimise flood risks on construction projects which will involve:
Assessing the risks
Avoiding risks where possible
Where risks cannot be avoided, taking due cognisance of the risks in the design and providing appropriate advice and warning to the client
Assessing the Risks
On any construction project there are likely to be two separate but related considerations:
Is the proposed structure itself vulnerable to flooding?
Is construction of the proposed structure likely to increase the risk of flooding elsewhere? This in turn requires consideration of the separate risks involved in the process of construction (risks arising from temporary works and which may or may not be the responsibility of the professional) and risks arising from the mere presence and/or operation of the permanent works.
Flood prevention works fall into a category of their own where the consequences of failure may be catastrophic. Any significant project is likely to involve a desk study of more or less detail. The desk ...
... study should include investigations into the flooding history of the site.
A desk study is likely to highlight risk factors for a locality which will need to be supplemented by site investigations such as ground investigations and topographical surveys.
If site investigations are provided by the client or commissioned from other consultants, the professional can generally expect to rely on them but he is not absolved of the responsibility to consider their adequacy. If they are inadequate, the client should be told. If the design is based on assumptions, the design assumptions should be spelt out.
Document the Risk
Whether or not formal reports are issued to a client, risks identified by the consultant should be discussed with the client and those discussions documented. A client may not be willing to incur the cost of flood mitigation measures which the consultant considers advisable. Such advice should be put in writing. An ‘audit trail' will greatly assist the defence of any future claim.
Contractual Considerations
The first and most obvious advice point to make is that the consultant should ensure that he has a written contract which, amongst other things, clearly sets out the scope of the services that he has agreed to provide.
Liability arising from provision of those services can be limited or in some circumstances excluded. Contractual provisions that a consultant should consider as a matter of course (both in relation to flooding risks and more generally) include:
Excluding liability for default of sub-consultants appointed with the agreement of the client
Excluding liability for consequential losses
Limiting liability to a specified sum (liability should be capped at a level not exceeding the amount of the consultant's professional indemnity insurance cover)
Restricting liability to the consultant's fair share of a loss on the assumption that other responsible parties will meet their own fair share of the loss (by means of a net contribution clause)
Appropriate exclusions or caveats, particularly where the consultant is acting in an advisory role or providing a survey report
Conclusion
Risks of flooding, like many other risks encountered in construction works can be managed provided that they are recognised and properly assessed. Liability for risks that cannot be avoided or designed out may be mitigated by appropriate use of contractual exclusions and limitations.
This document does not present a complete or comprehensive statement of fact or the law, nor does it constitute legal advice. It is intended only to highlight issues that might be of interest; specialist legal advice may be required where appropriate.
Paul berg is the owner of Griffiths & Armour Professional Risks which acts as manager for the professional indemnity division of Griffiths & Armour. Griffiths & Armour provide professional indemnity cover, construction liability insurance and risk management advice.
Add Comment
Insurance Articles
1. Reducing Snf Claim Denials: Common Errors And Preventive AuditingAuthor: 247 medical billing
2. The Cost Of Replacing A Clarinet Vs. Having Insurance Coverage
Author: musicinstrumentsins
3. Why String Instrument Owners Should Consider Specialized Insurance?
Author: victor12johnson
4. Wound Care Denials: How To Handle Appeals & Resubmissions Effectively
Author: 247 medical billing
5. The Best Health Insurance Plans In The Uk: A Comprehensive Guide For 2025
Author: Financeadvisors
6. Cpt Code 99204: Best Practices For Billing New Patient Office Visits
Author: 247 medical billing
7. Telehealth Billing For Nutrition Therapy: Correct Modifier Usage Explained
Author: 247 medical billing
8. Orchestra Insurance Vs. Individual Musician Coverage: What’s The Difference?
Author: micheljordan4
9. What Services A Music Insurance Company Usually Offers?
Author: victor12johnson
10. Common Risks Covered Under Instrument Coverage Policies
Author: micheljordan4
11. Steps To Choose The Right Music Teacher Insurance Policy
Author: musicinstrumentsins
12. Top Benefits Of Choosing Brass Musical Insurance
Author: victor12johnson
13. How Brokers Can Help You In Choosing The Best Health Insurance Plan
Author: Financeadvisors
14. Checklist While Buying Life Insurance Through An Intermediary
Author: Joffry Daniel
15. Overcoming Insurance & Reimbursement Barriers In Mental Health Practices
Author: 247 medical billing