ALL >> Legal >> View Article
Dui Arrests And Inventory Searches
In Kilburn vs. State, the First District Court of Appeal was presented with two distinct issues. The Defendant filed 2 separate motions to suppress. The 1st motion to suppress was filed alleging that the officer didn't have reasonable suspicion to stop the automobile. The 2nd motion to suppress was filed alleging that, after the defendant was arrested for DUI, the drugs found in his vehicle should be suppressed because the inventory search wasn't carried out in accordance with standardized criteria.With regard to the first motion to suppress, the trial court found that the deputy observed defendant's pick-up truck weaving and crossing lanes over a distance of roughly 2 1/2 miles. The deputy suspected that this was a DUI case. After activating his emergency lights, defendant didn't stop immediately. When defendant did stop, he almost hit a trash can. Defendant was then arrested for felony DUI because of the fact that this was defendant's fourth DUI. The trial court denied this motion to suppress and the appellate court affirmed finding that defendant's argument had no merit.After arresting defendant for DUI, the deputy ...
... made the decision to have defendant's truck towed since it was in an unsafe location. As a part of the impoundment procedure, the deputy conducted an inventory search of the truck pursuant to Sheriff's Office policy. During the inventory search, the deputy found marijuana, alprazolam and hydrocodone. The premise for the 2nd motion to suppress was that the Sheriff's Office had no standardized criteria or procedures for conducting an inventory search. The trial court denied the motion to suppress. The appellate court reversed the trial court's decision. The appellate court held that in order for the inventory search exception to the warrant requirement to apply, the inventory search has to be performed in accordance with standardized criteria. The stated purpose is "to limit police discretion in determining the scope of the search and ensures that the police will not abuse the exception and use the inventory search as a subterfuge for a criminal investigatory search."Daniel Rosenberg is a DUI Attorney located in Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida. For further information, please call (954)356-0413 or visit the following link:
Add Comment
Legal Articles
1. Divorce Lawyer In Noida | Legal Process & GuidanceAuthor: P&P Advocates
2. Transfer On Death Deed Vs Lady Death Deed
Author: Carl Glendon
3. How To Choose The Right Ri Criminal Lawyer For Your Defense
Author: Law Office of John R. Grasso
4. When Should You Contact A Criminal Attorney Rhode Island Residents Recommend?
Author: Law Office of John R. Grasso
5. Eu’s Landmark Artificial Intelligence Law Takes Effect With New Transparency Rules, But Key Safeguards Delayed
Author: The Law Reporters
6. India's Trusted Investigation Agency In Delhi Ncr
Author: Sandeep Chauhan
7. Top Blat Coaching In Kolkata: How To Prepare Effectively For Banaras Hindu University Law Entrance
Author: Amrita
8. Five Signs Your Cross-border Dispute Needs An Investment Treaty & Sovereign Dispute Arbitrator
Author: Andy
9. Best Slat Coaching In Kolkata: A Step-by-step Guide To Symbiosis Law Entrance Success
Author: Amrita
10. Personal Injury Lawyer Protects Clients By Communicating With Insurers
Author: Personal Injury Lawyer in Chamblee
11. The Work Of A Metal & Mining Dispute Arbitrator
Author: Andy
12. Washington Revocable Living Trust
Author: Carl Glendon
13. How Do I Choose The Right Criminal Lawyer In Melbourne?
Author: Peter Cayetuna
14. Best Lawyer & Advocate Near Me In Goregaon West, Mumbai, India
Author: Mayank
15. What Exactly Is An Nbfc?
Author: CorpZo






