Functional Business Analyst Vs. Techno Functional Business Analyst- The Difference

By Author: ramky johny
Total Articles: 34
Comment this article

Modern day business requires very high profile and highly experienced business analysts who would be responsible for the overall health and growth of a business. The major responsibilities of a business analyst are to analyze the business needs of the organization strategically, to understand the business policies and to market business approaches, to deduce business process modeling and interpret the business rules through technical systems.It is often observed that during the process of hiring professionals, most of the companies prefer techno functional business analyststothe non-technocrat ones. The reason is obvious and that is, the former can induce solutions to a business environment apart from satisfying the client while the latter would only be able to end up in a good business relation with the client.

Difference in approach between Functional Business Analysts and Techno Functional Business Analyst

It is most often observed at the workplace, that a functional Business analyst will achieve the following business goals:
1. He will interact with the clients and other stakeholders.
2. He will ...
... successfully shape and draft the business request, which will even include changing requests.
3. He will be responsible for conversion to high-level functional requirements.
4. He will use cases, typical screen prototypes and other examples.
5. He will use test scenarios
6. Finally, will be responsible for functional testing.

A business analyst if trained by the company will result in a very successful employee who will carve a permanent niche in the development of the company.Qualified training specialists should be engaged in providing business training, in order to upgrade the employees of the company. (Visit here)
It is observed that after successful business training provided by the training specialists, employees are more equipped with technical solutions and this upgrades their qualities as well as the overall profit of the organization. The differences observed in the mode of work of a techno functional business analyst are:

1. He will interact confidently with clients and other stakeholders.
2. Will scope and draft the business requirements, which include the change of requests.
3. He will convert to high-level functional requirements.
4. Look if the feature is new, if not; check what was requested for new.
5. Debug efficiently to find out the behavior of a feature.
6. Identify at a higher level, what is necessary to be done and what code needs to be created. It can be a procedure, trigger, batch, database or a screen.
7. Use cases, scans, test prototypes etc.
8. Perform test scenarios in specific cases.
9. Be responsible for functional testing etc.

Hence, it can be concluded that a techno functional business analyst training is always preferred. Nevertheless, it is observed that the latter often tends to increase the overhead charges and decrease the profitability as such. Therefore, a considerable fact could be that a business analyst is upgraded to a techno business analyst by effective business analyst training . By employing this strategy, the director will observe a surge in the line of profit and at the same time efficient, loyal, age-old employees in the company who are dedicated and ever willing to enhance the profit of the organization will not be lost.