Is It Apposite That The Fruit And The Vegetables Do Not Preserve From Cancer ?

By Author: Patrick Beaufay
Total Articles: 52
Comment this article

According to the the result of a recent American study of epidemiology, realized by a team of School of public health of Harvard, the regular consumption of fruit and vegetables would make it possible to reduce the risks of cardiovascular affections but would protect by no means from the cancer risks.

For some time we are into full delirious scientific pseudo advertisements, taken again with great cries by all the media. It is true that this studies are often the fruit of expert work considered in their discipline, but unfortunately, the protocol or the scientific rigour, which should be of setting in this research, largely leaves something to be desired. Would be this the research of publicity and stardom which would push these " scientists " has to publish the result hastily; studies or of research, while following a protocol d' the study imperfect or all least contestable.

For the rest, the consensus is far to be made, and many are the scientific specialists and other colleagues, not to confirm such these decisions; they do not dispute them complete.

We published a little while ...
... ago, it would be possible, according to Dr. Richard Beliveau, Directeur of the molecular Laboratory of medicine of the Holy Justine hospital, to reduce at least 50% of cancer risks by consuming daily certain food.

Here is an opinion, which however contradicts completely the American study. Dr. Richard Beliveau is indeed a very credible person.

Professor of biochemistry to the University of Quebec in Montreal and associated professor with the physiology department at the University of Montreal, he is also confronted every day with cases of cancers within the framework of his department within the Holy Justine hospital.

En wat think about Dr. Richard Beliveau:
This eminent specialist issues serious reserves on the result of this study. He estimates that the parameters of research are not correctly defined and that the followed method does not take account of many very important factors, such as the effect of synergy of food, the quality of the food (geographical source and mode of culture of the food affects largely its food values). As well the same study does not take account of the general lifestyle of the subjects subjected to the study.

The judgment of Dr. Beliveau is that the epidemiological interviews appear overly all-purpose to complete because a constructive or null reason, fruit also to vegetables on cancer. You could consume some diet causing of the protective effects opposition cancer, but therefore inside addition you consume inside quantities; different diet plenty of less wise because fitness, it is some that the constructive diet loses plenty of of its protective outcome.

What we think about:
All the question could be summarized with this: You consume more poison or antipoison? The rule in healthy nutrition being to consume a diet rich in protective food, such as the fruit and vegetables. This should protect you from the harmful effects of an occasional consumption of food or elements of pollution, being able to induce a cancer.

That being quite different from the idea that a person can gaver of muck foods and to follow a contrary lifestyle to the laws of health, and to think to consume each day broccoli, will put him save from some cancers or other degenerative diseases!

The fact of recognizing a protective action of cancer with certain food, with fruits and vegetables, by Dr. Béliveau, is the rigorously scientific result of a search carried out of way, and because of positive tests obtained in a daily practice with patients reached of cancers.

It exists lately hundreds of interviews published on the protective effects of some diet, opposition cancer. The listing of diet bothered lengthens a daylight. Other than because inside this earth nothing is highly colorless or highly black, the outcome of duality of Yin also to Yang, there will troth constantly negative interviews or voices to advance to contradict whatever is constructive.

Our assumption:
Permit us maintain to trail a healthy means of continuation additionally as maintain to habitually consume fruit additionally as vegetables of daintiness. Additionally permit us not hesitate to additionally consume nutrition diets additionally as nutrients which will appear to strengthen the effects of an healthy nutrition. We direct out that it is not constantly trouble-free, this day to acquire nutrition of daintiness, additionally as that aggressions of the pollution of the setting obliges us to consume a larger measure of protective issues. A measure which it is not constantly potential to locate major nutrition.