ALL >> Legal >> View Article
Qld Permitting Use Of A Place -s11dma
What the Law states - Permitting Use Of A Place - S11 Drugs Misuse Act
Section 11(1) of the Drugs Misuse Act 1986 provides that
1. A person who, being the occupier or concerned in the management or control of a place, permits the place to be used for the commission of a crime defined in this part is guilty of a crime.
What the Police must prove - Permitting Use Of A Place - S11 Drugs Misuse Act
In order for the Police to prove their case at Court, they must prove each of the following matters beyond a reasonable doubt.
1. That the accused was the "occupier concerned in the management or control" of a place. As to occupation, an accused must be making use of a place with enough defacto control or management of the place to enable that use. A person is not an occupier if his/her only connection is the presence of some belongings. Mere ownership is also not sufficient and personal involvement must be proved.
2. That the accused "permitted." Standing by and watching somebody else doing something does not always establish permission. However, neither is specific activity always necessary ...
... to prove "permitting". It will be a question of fact and degree as to the degree of collusion.
3. Used for the commission of a drug offence under the act. The prosecution will be required to prove the drugs offence under one of the other sections of the act. For example, to be guilty of permitting the use of a place to produce a dangerous drug, it must first be proven that the dangerous drug was produced in contravention of section 8 of the Drugs Misuse Act. Note that under subsection 11(2) of the Drugs Misuse Act the dangerous drug to which the commission of a crime relates is the dangerous drug directly or indirectly involved and in relation to which proof is required to establish the commission of the crime.
It will be necessary for the Police in every offence to prove that the accused was the person who committed the offence.
Possible Defences - Permitting Use Of A Place - S11 Drugs Misuse Act
Possible defences to this offence include but are not limited to:
1. Not sufficient control or management to establish occupation
2. Lack of sufficient involvement to constitute "permission"
3. Lack of knowledge as to the commission of the offence under the DMA
4. duress
The defendant was not an occupier of the place or had no management of the place.
If you are interested to know something more on Use of a place for drugs - S10DMA and other details,you are welcome to the Drug Charges site.
Add Comment
Legal Articles
1. Nova Scotia Provincial Nominee ProgramAuthor: Atul
2. Understanding The Role Of Iepf In Investment Claim Assistance
Author: Expertvuw Management
3. Vikram Vaibhav: The Young Entrepreneur Redefining Digital Innovation And Legal Tech
Author: sardar Patel
4. Mio & Partners | Parent Rights In Custody Cases
Author: MIO & Partners
5. Jewellery Redesign - Transforming Old Pieces Into Modern Treasures
Author: Natalie Williams
6. British Columbia Provincial Nominee Program
Author: Atul
7. What Is A Parenting Plan And What Must It Include In Florida?
Author: Grant J Gisondo P.A.
8. Australia Migration Plan 2026–2027
Author: Atul
9. How A Criminal Defense Attorney Van Nuys Handles Felony Charges?
Author: Van Nuys Crime
10. Top Qualities To Look For In An Advocate In Gurgaon
Author: Legal Eagles Eye
11. Medical Malpractice Lawyer In Delhi| Mednlaw
Author: Gaurav Sharma
12. Ontario Pnp: Ontario Plans To Restructure Its Immigration Pathways
Author: Atul
13. How An Auto Accident Lawyer In Las Vegas Can Protect Your Rights
Author: Nwogbe Law
14. Medical Negligence Lawyer In Delhi Ncr | Expert Legal Help
Author: Gaurav Sharma
15. Why Trust The Best Immigration Consultancy In Nehru Place, Delhi
Author: Atul






