Moral Criteria Have Primacy Over Social Conventions In Making Moral Decisions

By Author: Cornelia
Total Articles: 95
Comment this article

By contrast, in the post conventional schema, moral criteria (such as respect for human rights) have primacy over social conventions (such as role expectations, laws, rules, and contracts) in making moral decisions. Further, members' duties and rights derive from the moral purpose of the arrangement, not from its existence per se, especially because there are many possible ways to organize such Replica Omega Speedmaster social arrangements and because societies change over time. Reasoning grounded in this schema is centered on and guided by a moral ideal grounded in concepts of justice and fairness for all.

The updated version of the widely used Defining Issues Test includes scoring for all three schemas. A recent example of the use of these schemas to interpret moral judgment research may be found in Maeda, Thoma, and Bebeau. Kohlberg's theory and its foundation in justice and social reciprocity has been criticized by scholars who argue that this approach is too focused on reasoning and rationality and neglects other moral attributes ...
... such as empathy and caring, and in so doing, excludes many other voices, especially those of women.

The publication of Gilligan's provocative book that addresses issues of women's moral development triggered a great deal of scholarly work, not only on gender differences in psychological research in general and in moral judgment research in particular, but on caring as an alternative theoretical approach that emphasizes responsibilities in contrast with a justice approach that Replica Cartier emphasizes rights. The juxtaposition of care and justice as contradictory concepts is baffling. Brabeck's (1989) concept of the hierarchy of opposites that typically favor men is instructive here: The tendency in Western culture to dichotomize, reason-emotion, fact-value, good-evil, culture-nature, masculine-feminine, etc., assumes a hierarchy of opposites in which the first attribute is valued over the second. In contemporary society this tendency to dichotomize has been extended to individualism-community, autonomy-relatedness, competition-cooperation, right-responsibilities, Elsewhere, Brabeck argued that the attributes associated with caring (e.g., empathy) are embedded within the moral sensitivity component of the Four Component Model, suggesting that these approaches reflected differences in component focus rather than two approaches to morality in general or moral judgment in particular.

Advances in scholarship on caring (broadly defined) may also be seen in several other important books in the field. And although researchers have conducted many studies contrasting justice and caring as moral orientations that may be gender-related, outside of Gilligan's original conceptualization and Lyons's subsequent work on levels of moral development from a caring orientation, there has been little sustained theory building or research to inform or validate such a conceptualization. This is surprising, given the high level of interest in caring as a moral construct.