Why Access Reviews Keep Failing In Regulated, Hybrid Environments

By Author: Soham Biswas
Total Articles: 21
Comment this article

The root problem is not lack of effort. It is that most access review programs rely on identity systems that were never designed to support governance at scale. Active Directory and Entra are effective for authentication and access enablement, but they are not built to govern ERP access, enforce segregation of duties, or produce consistent audit evidence across hybrid environments.

As access expands across directories, ERP systems, servers, databases, and cloud platforms, governance fragments. Reviews fall back to spreadsheets, remediation drifts into tickets and email, and evidence is reconstructed after the fact.

Organizations that fix this take a different approach. They focus reviews on high-risk access, align review frequency with exposure, and introduce a governance layer without rebuilding identity infrastructure. Remediation is enforced, evidence is generated continuously, and audits become more predictable.

If access reviews are getting harder every cycle, the problem is not the people running them. It is the absence of governance where governance actually belongs.

See how governance-first access reviews work in practice
Explore how OpenIAM helps regulated organizations simplify access reviews without rebuilding identity.

https://www.openiam.com/use-cases/identity-governance/simplifying-user-access-reviews