Management Review Documentation In Fssc 22000

By Author: Sarah
Total Articles: 300
Comment this article

Management review is a formal evaluation by top management of the food safety management system (FSMS) performance. In FSSC 22000 (which is based on ISO 22000), management reviews are mandatory, and documented records of these reviews form part of the required FSSC 22000 documentation. These periodic reviews ensure the ongoing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the FSMS. They demonstrate leadership commitment and drive continual improvement by identifying necessary changes to policy, objectives and resources.

Purpose and Importance

A properly documented management review serves several critical purposes. It verifies that the FSMS continues to meet food safety goals and regulatory requirements, and it identifies opportunities for improvement. The review ensures alignment between the organization’s objectives and its food safety policy. Documenting the meeting topics, decisions and responsibilities provides traceability and evidence of compliance during audits. For example, documented outputs typically include the meeting agenda, attendance records, minutes and an action plan listing follow-up items. This ...
... documentation shows auditors that top management is actively overseeing the FSMS and addressing any issues that arise.

Frequency and Participants

Management reviews must be scheduled at planned intervals – typically at least once per year, though many organizations hold them quarterly or semiannually based on risk and complexity. A formal schedule and procedure ensure consistency. These reviews are led by top management or the FSMS team leader, and include representatives from all key functions that impact food safety. For example, the review might be chaired by the plant manager or CEO and involve the Quality/Food Safety Manager. Other participants typically include department heads from Quality Assurance, Production, Maintenance, Procurement and other relevant areas. Involving a cross-functional team ensures that all aspects of food safety are considered and that decisions have broad organizational support.

Key Inputs to the Review

The management review agenda is built around specific inputs. Common inputs include:

• Audit Results: Findings from recent internal and external food safety audits.
• Corrective/Preventive Actions: Status of corrective actions for past nonconformities and any preventive measures under way.
• Performance Data: Relevant KPIs and trend reports (such as monitoring results, validation outcomes, process control metrics, supplier performance data).
• Customer Feedback: Complaints, feedback or satisfaction trends that could affect food safety.
• Incidents and Withdrawals: Records of any food safety incidents, near-misses, product withdrawals or recalls.
• Changes in Requirements: New or revised statutory, regulatory or customer requirements and their potential impact.
• Previous Review Follow-Ups: Status of action items and commitments from earlier management reviews.
• Resource and Training Needs: Assessment of resources (staffing, equipment, training programs) needed to support the FSMS.
• Other FSMS Issues: Any new circumstances or risks that might affect food safety (for example, changes in raw material availability or technology).

Collecting and presenting these inputs gives management a complete picture of system performance and risk. This information supports data-driven discussion and informed decision-making during the review.

Outputs and Follow-Up Actions

The outputs of a management review are documented decisions and action plans that improve the FSMS. Typical outputs include:

• Improvement Actions: Identification of opportunities for improvement and assignment of corrective or preventive actions.
• Updates to Objectives or Policy: Revisions to food safety objectives, targets, policies or procedures as needed.
• Resource Decisions: Allocation of additional resources (such as new equipment, staff or training budgets) to address identified needs.
• Risk and Hazard Updates: Results of any risk assessments or hazard analyses that require changes.
• Action Plan: A clear list of follow-up tasks with responsible persons and target completion dates.
• Performance Targets: Establishment or revision of performance targets and monitoring plans.

All outputs should be recorded in the management review minutes. The organization must track the follow-up on action items until closure, ensuring that each assigned action is completed effectively and verified. In subsequent reviews, management should review the status of these actions to confirm progress or take further steps as needed.

Best Practices for Documentation

Consistent, well-organized documentation strengthens the management review process and demonstrates compliance. Best practices include:

• Formal Procedure: Maintain a documented procedure or standard work instruction that defines the management review’s scope, frequency, required inputs and participant roles.
• Structured Agenda and Minutes: Prepare a detailed agenda in advance covering all required topics. Record minutes during the meeting that capture attendees, discussed items, decisions and assigned action items.
• Templates and Checklists: Use standardized templates or checklists to ensure all mandatory inputs and agenda topics are covered in each review. For example, include a list of recent audit findings, KPI graphs and a section for changes in regulation.
• Record Retention: Store all meeting records (agendas, presentations, minutes, reports) in a dedicated section of the FSMS documentation. This centralized archive ensures that records are easily retrievable for audits.
• Action Tracking: Maintain an action item register or follow-up log listing each task, owner and due date. Review this log in every meeting to confirm completion and note any overdue items.
• Data-Driven Discussion: Base the management review on concrete data and evidence (audit scores, trend charts, compliance rates). This focus on facts makes the discussion objective and productive.
• Accountability and Follow-Through: Assign a senior manager (often the Quality or Food Safety Manager) to coordinate the review process, compile inputs and ensure that documentation is complete.
• Communication: After the review, distribute a summary of key decisions and action plans to all relevant personnel. Update procedures or work instructions as needed and provide training if processes change.
Adopting these practices ensures that management reviews are thorough, systematic and well documented. Thorough documentation becomes part of the organization’s evidence during certification audits and regulatory inspections.

All records of the management review – including minutes, action plans and evidence of implementation – are maintained as part of the official FSMS record set. Well-organized documentation demonstrates compliance and readiness for audits. Check the complete FSSC 22000 Documents - https://www.globalmanagergroup.com/Products/fssc-22000-certification-manual-procedures-documents.htm/ - like manual, standard operating procedures, forms, exhibits, etc for FSSC 22000 Certification. Management review documentation is a important document of a compliant FSSC 22000 system. By fully addressing the requirements for inputs, participants and follow-up actions, and by maintaining clear records, an organization shows continual improvement of its food safety management system and strong leadership commitment to food safety.