The Hidden Costs Of Building An In-house Devops Team (and How To Avoid Them)

By Author: DataTech Master
Total Articles: 9
Comment this article

The Hidden Costs of Building an In-House DevOps Team (And How to Avoid Them)

In today’s fast-moving digital landscape, DevOps isn’t just a technical function—it’s the backbone of speed, scalability, and reliability. Every CTO knows that deploying quickly and reliably is a competitive advantage. The big question is how to achieve it: do you build your own in-house DevOps team, or do you opt for a managed model like DevOps as a Service (DaaS)?

At first glance, building an in-house team might seem like the safer bet. You get direct control over your people, processes, and tools. But what many leaders underestimate are the hidden costs that accumulate well beyond salaries. Let’s break down what those costs are—and how you can avoid them without sacrificing quality.

1. Salaries and Benefits Go Beyond the Obvious

Hiring a DevOps engineer is not cheap. According to industry benchmarks, experienced DevOps professionals command six-figure salaries in many markets. But salary is only the starting point. When you add benefits, insurance, bonuses, and overhead, the real cost per engineer can easily ...
... jump 25–40%.

Multiply that across a team of specialists—cloud architects, security engineers, automation experts—and suddenly your “lean” team becomes a major financial commitment. Worse still, DevOps engineers are in short supply, meaning you’re likely to pay a premium to attract and retain them.

The alternative: With DaaS, you’re not hiring one or two people—you’re tapping into an entire team of cross-functional experts at a predictable monthly cost.

2. The Ongoing Cost of Tools and Licensing

A modern DevOps pipeline isn’t powered by just one tool. From CI/CD systems like Jenkins, GitLab, or CircleCI, to monitoring tools like Prometheus and Datadog, to infrastructure management platforms like Terraform or Kubernetes—your toolchain quickly expands.

Each of these comes with licensing fees, integration costs, and the time your engineers need to configure and maintain them. These are often recurring annual or monthly expenses that scale up as your infrastructure grows.

The alternative: DaaS providers already maintain mature toolchains that can be customized to your needs. Instead of paying for multiple licenses separately, you leverage their economies of scale.

3. Training and Skill Gaps

DevOps is not a one-and-done skillset. The ecosystem evolves rapidly: new cloud services emerge, security standards change, and automation practices advance. Keeping your in-house team at the cutting edge requires ongoing investment in certifications, conferences, and training programs.

And let’s not forget opportunity cost: when your engineers are learning, they’re not delivering.

The alternative: With DaaS, continuous upskilling is part of the service provider’s DNA. You benefit from the latest expertise without footing the training bill.

4. Infrastructure and Hidden Overheads

Beyond people and tools, there’s the cost of the infrastructure your DevOps team relies on: testing environments, monitoring dashboards, logging infrastructure, and sandbox systems. These environments consume cloud resources that add up quickly on your monthly bill.

Then there are softer costs—things like setting up internal documentation, compliance audits, or dealing with downtime when processes aren’t well-optimized. These often get overlooked in financial planning but can quietly drain both money and morale.

The alternative: A DaaS partner spreads these infrastructure and operational costs across multiple clients, making it far more cost-efficient for each individual customer.

5. Risk of Turnover and Knowledge Drain

One of the most underestimated costs of building in-house is the risk of attrition. DevOps engineers are in high demand. If one of your key people leaves, you face not just recruitment expenses, but also the knowledge gap they leave behind.

Onboarding replacements takes months, during which your velocity and reliability can suffer. The hidden cost here is business risk—lost productivity, delayed launches, or even outages.

The alternative: With DaaS, you don’t face single points of failure. The provider ensures continuity with a team-based approach, so your operations aren’t dependent on any one individual.

Why DevOps as a Service Makes Sense

When you add up salaries, tool licensing, training, infrastructure, and turnover risks, building an in-house DevOps team becomes a multi-million-dollar commitment over a few years. For startups and even mid-sized enterprises, that level of investment can be prohibitive.

https://datafortune.com/services/devops-as-a-service/ flips the equation. Instead of unpredictable and ballooning costs, you get:

A predictable, subscription-based pricing model

Access to a diverse pool of experts instead of one or two hires

Faster time-to-market with mature, ready-to-use pipelines

Reduced business risk through built-in redundancy and best practices

In other words, DaaS lets you focus on building your product while leaving the heavy lifting of infrastructure, automation, and monitoring to specialists.

Final Thoughts

For finance-aware tech leaders, the decision isn’t just about control—it’s about cost efficiency, risk mitigation, and scalability. Building an in-house DevOps team comes with a range of hidden expenses that can slow you down and strain your budget.

By considering a DevOps as a Service model, you gain access to enterprise-grade capabilities at a fraction of the cost—and without the operational headaches.

Want to calculate your potential savings? Our DevOps as a Service model provides a predictable, scalable cost structure tailored to your business needs.