Tesco And Ocado Q-commerce Dataset For Competitive Analysis

By Author: Den Rediant
Total Articles: 67
Comment this article

Tesco and Ocado Q-Commerce Dataset for Competitive Analysis: Market Insights and Strategic Growth
Scraping-Hotel-Deals-from-Aggregator-Sites-in-Off-Season-A-Strategic-Advantage-for-Travel-Businesses
Introduction
The UK quick commerce (Q-commerce) market has transformed the retail landscape, with consumer demand for rapid delivery and competitive pricing driving innovation. The Tesco and Ocado Q-Commerce Dataset for Competitive analysis provides a foundation for understanding pricing strategies and market positioning. Scraping Tesco and Ocado Data for Benchmarking enables retailers to extract actionable insights from vast datasets, offering a window into real-time market dynamics. By using methods to Scrape Quick Commerce Data for Competitive Analysis, businesses can monitor competitors, optimize pricing, and enhance operational efficiency. This report examines competitive benchmarking using Tesco and Ocado Q-commerce datasets, focusing on macro-level retail pricing intelligence to identify trends, strategies, and opportunities.

Methodology
Methodology
Data was collected from Tesco.com and ...
... Ocado.com over three months (April–June 2025) using web scraping techniques. The datasets included pricing, product availability, promotional activities, and delivery metrics for over 15,000 SKUs across 20 product categories, such as fresh produce, dairy, bakery, and household goods. Extract Tesco and Ocado Pricing Data Insights to clean and normalize the data using Python libraries (Pandas, NumPy) and visualize trends with Matplotlib. The analysis compared Tesco’s store-based Q-commerce model with Ocado’s automated Zoom delivery service to identify macro-level pricing patterns.

Data Sources
Tesco Quick Commerce Dataset: Captured from Tesco’s online grocery platform, including Tesco Express and click-and-collect services.
Ocado Quick Commerce Dataset: Sourced from Ocado’s Zoom rapid delivery service, emphasizing automated distribution.
Quick Commerce Datasets: Aggregated data from both retailers, covering pricing, stock, and promotions.
Data Analysis and Findings
1. Pricing Strategies and Competitive Positioning

Tesco & Ocado Data Scraping for Competitive Insights revealed distinct pricing strategies. Tesco leverages its extensive physical store network and Tesco Quick Commerce Dataset to offer lower prices, averaging £50.12 for a 30-item basket, while Ocado’s premium positioning results in a £60.45 average basket price, a 17.2% premium. Tesco’s Clubcard loyalty program drives customer retention through personalized discounts, with 30% of SKUs featuring promotions. Ocado, however, uses AI-driven upselling, increasing average order value by 9.1% through premium product recommendations.

2. Product Assortment and Stock Availability

The Quick Commerce Datasets highlighted differences in assortment and availability. Tesco’s dataset included 14,567 SKUs, with 48% private-label products, reflecting a cost-focused strategy. Ocado’s 10,234 SKUs, supported by the Ocado Quick Commerce Dataset, emphasized premium brands (35%), particularly Waitrose and M&S partnerships. Stock availability was stronger for Ocado (96% in-stock rate) compared to Tesco (91%), due to Ocado’s automated supply chain. Table 1 provides a detailed breakdown of assortment and stock metrics across key categories.

Table 1: Product Assortment and Stock Availability (April–June 2025)

Retailer Category Total SKUs Private Label (%) Premium Brands (%) In-Stock Rate (%) Out-of-Stock Incidents Avg. Price per SKU (£)
Tesco Fresh Produce 2,345 50% 15% 90% 234 1.25
Tesco Dairy 1,876 45% 20% 92% 150 1.80
Tesco Bakery 1,234 60% 10% 89% 167 1.10
Tesco Packaged Goods 3,456 55% 18% 91% 312 2.15
Tesco Household Essentials 2,789 40% 25% 93% 198 3.20
Tesco Beverages 1,567 35% 30% 90% 141 1.90
Tesco Frozen Foods 1,300 50% 15% 92% 112 2.50
Ocado Fresh Produce 1,789 10% 40% 95% 89 1.49
Ocado Dairy 1,456 15% 35% 96% 58 2.10
Ocado Bakery 987 20% 45% 94% 59 1.35
Ocado Packaged Goods 2,678 12% 38% 97% 80 2.40
Ocado Household Essentials 2,134 18% 42% 96% 64 3.75
Ocado Beverages 1,234 10% 50% 95% 62 2.20
Ocado Frozen Foods 956 15% 35% 96% 48 2.80
3. Category-Level Pricing Dynamics

Quick Commerce & FMCG Data Extraction Services enabled a granular analysis of pricing trends. Tesco offered lower prices in fresh produce (£1.25/kg for apples vs. Ocado’s £1.49/kg) and packaged goods (£2.15/SKU vs. £2.40/SKU). Ocado’s premium pricing was evident in household essentials (£3.75/SKU vs. Tesco’s £3.20/SKU), driven by eco-friendly and branded products. Tesco’s pricing volatility was higher, with 20% of SKUs adjusted daily, compared to Ocado’s 13%, reflecting Tesco’s rule-based pricing versus Ocado’s AI-driven dynamic pricing.

4. Delivery and Customer Experience

Tesco’s click-and-collect model achieved a 2.4-hour average delivery time, while Ocado’s Zoom service averaged 1.7 hours. Scraped customer reviews (via TrustPilot) showed Tesco’s customers reported fewer issues with damaged goods (3.2% of orders) compared to Ocado (5.8%). Ocado’s premium packaging, however, scored higher for sustainability, with 82% of customers noting recyclable materials.

5. Macro-Level Pricing Intelligence

Tesco’s market share (44%) dwarfs Ocado’s (11%), but Ocado’s revenue per order (£58.92) exceeds Tesco’s (£49.67) by 18.6%. Tesco’s aggressive promotions (32% of SKUs) contrast with Ocado’s selective discounts (20%). Table 2 details macro-level pricing metrics across multiple dimensions.

Table 2: Macro-Level Pricing Metrics (April–June 2025)

Retailer Avg. Basket Price (£) Discounted SKUs (%) Avg. Order Value (£) Market Share (%) Avg. Delivery Time (hrs) Customer Satisfaction (%) Promotion Frequency (%) Revenue per Order (£)
Tesco 50.12 32% 49.67 44% 2.4 88% 30% 49.67
Tesco Fresh Produce 28% 45.23 - - 90% 25% -
Tesco Dairy 30% 50.12 - - 87% 28% -
Tesco Bakery 35% 42.89 - - 85% 33% -
Tesco Packaged Goods 29% 51.34 - - 89% 27% -
Tesco Household Essentials 31% 53.67 - - 86% 30% -
Ocado 60.45 20% 58.92 11% 1.7 92% 18% 58.92
Ocado Fresh Produce 15% 55.67 - - 94% 14% -
Ocado Dairy 18% 60.23 - - 93% 16% -
Ocado Bakery 22% 52.45 - - 91% 20% -
Ocado Packaged Goods 19% 59.12 - - 92% 17% -
Ocado Household Essentials 21% 62.34 - - 90% 19% -
Strategic Implications
Pricing Optimization: Tesco’s high-frequency promotions suit price-sensitive customers, while Ocado’s AI-driven pricing maximizes profitability.
Assortment Strategy: Tesco’s private-label dominance offers cost advantages; Ocado’s premium brands target affluent consumers.
Operational Efficiency: Ocado’s automation ensures stock reliability, a model for Q-commerce scalability.
Customer Experience: Tesco’s lower damage rates suggest robust fulfillment, while Ocado’s sustainability focus appeals to eco-conscious consumers.
Challenges and Limitations
Scraping challenges include website changes, anti-scraping measures, and GDPR compliance. The datasets exclude internal metrics like margins and supplier costs. The three-month period may miss seasonal trends.

Conclusion
Competitive benchmarking using Tesco and Ocado datasets provides critical insights for macro-level retail pricing intelligence. Quick Commerce Data Intelligence Services enable real-time competitor monitoring, while Quick Commerce Delivery Scraping API offers granular data on pricing and stock. Leveraging Grocery and Supermarket Store Datasets empowers retailers to optimize strategies, ensuring competitiveness in the dynamic Q-commerce market.

Experience top-notch web scraping service and mobile app scraping solutions with iWeb Data Scraping. Our skilled team excels in extracting various data sets, including retail store locations and beyond. Connect with us today to learn how our customized services can address your unique project needs, delivering the highest efficiency and dependability for all your data requirements.