ALL >> Legal >> View Article
Vedic Apprehension Of Legal Plunder Part One – An Appraisal

The law has been perverted through the influence of two very different causes; naked greed and misconceived philanthropy. Self-preservation and development is the common aspiration of all men, in such a way that if everyone enjoyed the free exercise of his faculties and the free disposition of their fruits, social progress would be incessant, uninterrupted, inevitable. But there is also another disposition which is common to them. This is to live and to develop, when they can, at the expense of one another. This is no rash imputation, emanating from a gloomy, uncharitable spirit. History bears witness to the truth of it, by the incessant wars, the migrations of races, sectarian oppressions, the universality of slavery, the frauds in trade, and the monopolies with which its annals abound. This fatal disposition has its origin in the very constitution of man--in that primitive, and universal, and invincible sentiment that urges it towards its well-being, and makes it seek to escape pain. Man can only derive life and enjoyment from a perpetual search and appropriation; that is, from a perpetual application of his faculties to objects, ...
... or from labor. This is the origin of property. But also he may live and enjoy, by seizing and appropriating the productions of the faculties of his fellow men. This is the origin of plunder. Now, labor being in itself a pain, and man being naturally inclined to avoid pain, it follows, and history proves it, that wherever plunder is less burdensome than labor, it prevails; and neither religion nor morality can, in this case, prevent it from prevailing. When does plunder cease, then? When it becomes more burdensome and more dangerous than labor. It is very evident that the proper aim of law is to oppose the fatal tendency to plunder with the powerful obstacle of collective force; that all its measures should be in favor of property, and against plunder. But the law is made, generally, by one man, or by one class of men. And as law cannot exist without the sanction and the support of a preponderant force, it must finally place this force in the hands of those who legislate. This inevitable phenomenon, combined with the fatal tendency that, we have said, exists in the heart of man, explains the almost universal perversion of law. It is easy to conceive that, instead of being a check upon injustice, it becomes its most invincible instrument. It is easy to conceive that, according to the power of the legislator, it destroys for its own profit, and in different degrees amongst the rest of the community, personal independence by slavery, liberty by oppression, and property by plunder. It is in the nature of men to rise against the injustice of which they are the victims. When, therefore, plunder is organized by law, for the profit of those who perpetrate it, all the plundered classes tend, either by peaceful or revolutionary means, to enter in some way into the manufacturing of laws. These classes, according to the degree of enlightenment at which they have arrived, may propose to themselves two very different ends, when they thus attempt the attainment of their political rights; either they may wish to put an end to lawful plunder, or they may desire to take part in it.Up to that time, lawful plunder has been exercised by the few upon the many, as is the case in countries where the right of legislating is confined to a few hands. But now it has become universal, and the equilibrium is sought in universal plunder. The injustice that society contains, instead of being rooted out of it, is generalized. As soon as the injured classes have recovered their political rights, their first thought is not to abolish plunder (this would suppose them to possess enlightenment, which they cannot have), but to organize against the other classes, and to their own detriment, a system of reprisals--as if it was necessary, before the reign of justice arrives, that all should undergo a cruel retribution--some for their iniquity and some for their ignorance. It would be impossible, therefore, to introduce into society a greater change and a greater evil than this--the conversion of the law into an instrument of plunder. What would be the consequences of such a perversion? It would require volumes to describe them all. We must content ourselves with pointing out the most striking. In the first place, it would efface from everybody's conscience the distinction between justice and injustice. No society can exist unless the laws are respected to a certain degree, but the safest way to make them respected is to make them respectable. When law and morality are in contradiction to each other, the citizen finds himself in the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense, or of losing his respect for the law--two evils of equal magnitude, between which it would be difficult to choose. It is so much in the nature of law to support justice that in the minds of the masses they are one and the same. There is in all of us a strong disposition to regard what is lawful as legitimate, so much so that many falsely derive all justice from law. It is sufficient, then, for the law to order and sanction plunder, that it may appear to many consciences just and sacred. Slavery, protection, and monopoly find defenders, not only in those who profit by them, but in those who suffer by them. If you suggest a doubt as to the morality of these institutions, it is said directly--"You are a dangerous experimenter, a utopian, a theorist, a despiser of the laws; you would shake the basis upon which society rests. “Lecturing upon morality, or political economy ; that henceforth science be taught not only with sole reference to free exchange (to liberty, property, and justice), as has been the case up to the present time, but also, and especially, with reference to the facts and legislation (contrary to liberty, property, and justice) that regulate industry. That, in public lecterns salaried by the treasury, the intellectual abstain rigorously from endangering in the slightest degree the respect due to the laws now in force. So that if a law exists that sanctions slavery or monopoly, oppression or plunder, in any form whatever, it must not even be mentioned--for how can it be mentioned without damaging the respect that it inspires? Still further, morality and political economy must be taught in connection with this law--that is, under the supposition that it must be just, only because it is law.
lecturer at a private learning institution ( UTAR).
Add Comment
Legal Articles
1. Annulment Vs. Divorce In Singapore: Legal Differences ExplainedAuthor: Singapore Sole Parent
2. Experienced Civil Lawyer In Chennai: Your Guide To Justice And Peace Of Mind
Author: Sonu
3. Expert Guidance On Bankruptcy In Fort Worth: Your Path To Financial Relief
Author: RecoveryLawGroup
4. Why The Uae Is Emerging As A Global Hub For Arbitration Law And Dispute Resolution
Author: Dr. Hassan Elhais
5. How The Best Immigration Agent In Australia Can Simplify Your Visa Journey
Author: Reach Immigration
6. Your Rights As A Renter: What Your Landlord Can And Can’t Legally Do
Author: Monica Quinn
7. Mastering The Sponsor Management System (sms) – 2025: A Practical Guide For Uk Employers
Author: Conroy Baker
8. The Role Of A Divorce Law Firm In Singapore: What They Actually Do
Author: Singapore Sole Parent
9. How Much Does A Divorce Lawyer Cost In Singapore? Fee Breakdown
Author: Singapore Sole Parent
10. Navigating Financial Relief: Your Guide To Bankruptcy Attorneys In Houston, Tx
Author: RecoveryLawGroup
11. How An Ri Dui Lawyer Can Help You Avoid A Criminal Record
Author: Law Office of John R. Grasso
12. Uk Visa Refusal Reversal: Expert Assistance 2025 Guide
Author: The SmartMove2UK
13. Divorce Law Firms In Singapore: Services, Fees, And What To Look For
Author: Singapore Sole Parent
14. Why Are More Traders Turning To Crypto Trading Bots In 2025?
Author: William carter
15. Nyc’s E2 Visa Experts: Real Results, Real Fast
Author: Berd and Klauss PLLC