Use Internet To Help Writing

By Author: Adela
Total Articles: 74
Comment this article

While the presence of links to other sites does not necessarily guarantee a site's credibility, a site is more credible if the authors provide links to source material for the information on the site (as opposed to links to other sites of interest). I encouraged students in their research to follow links they found in their reading and to examine the content on those connected sites. Examining these Cartier Replica links can help us judge the sources used by an author; the lack of such links can be a reason to investigate further a site's credibility. For advanced students, I suggested that they use a Google search to see what other sites link to the site in question; this is done by entering "link:" into a Google search box followed by the complete Web address of the site in question. When we conducted a search for other sites that linked to the "Tree Octopus" site, for example, we found numerous links from personal blogs but no other scientific-looking sites that discussed the endangered animal. These results caused us to think twice about ...
... accepting the information on the "Tree Octopus" site.

Finally, I suggested that students look at the overall layout and at any additional content on a website. The predominance of advertisements on a site could be a clue that the site's author might be more interested in commercial gain than in distributing accurate information. A site with numerous grammatical errors or an amateurish appearance could also be suspect; an author who takes the time to polish a site and closely proofread the information presented could be more credible. In addition, some types of websites, such as personal blogs or message boards, are physically formatted in a recognizable way. I encouraged students to be careful with information they found in sites such as these since they tend to be forums for personal opinion or conjecture, rather than sources of factual information.

Looking at initial markers can sometimes help us reject a site outright, but more often it alerts us to possible concerns about the Omega Replica Watches legitimacy of information contained in a site. Many sites can look professional and polished, contain a lot of information, and link to legitimate sites (or even do a careful job of documenting sources) but still contain information that is questionable. Looking at initial markers is a start, but we often need additional strategies to evaluate what we read.

While the presence of links to other sites does not necessarily guarantee a site's credibility, a site is more credible if the authors provide links to source material for the information on the site (as opposed to links to other sites of interest). I encouraged students in their research to follow links they found in their reading and to examine the content on those connected sites. Examining these Cartier Replica links can help us judge the sources used by an author; the lack of such links can be a reason to investigate further a site's credibility. For advanced students, I suggested that they use a Google search to see what other sites link to the site in question; this is done by entering "link:" into a Google search box followed by the complete Web address of the site in question. When we conducted a search for other sites that linked to the "Tree Octopus" site, for example, we found numerous links from personal blogs but no other scientific-looking sites that discussed the endangered animal. These results caused us to think twice about accepting the information on the "Tree Octopus" site.

Finally, I suggested that students look at the overall layout and at any additional content on a website. The predominance of advertisements on a site could be a clue that the site's author might be more interested in commercial gain than in distributing accurate information. A site with numerous grammatical errors or an amateurish appearance could also be suspect; an author who takes the time to polish a site and closely proofread the information presented could be more credible. In addition, some types of websites, such as personal blogs or message boards, are physically formatted in a recognizable way. I encouraged students to be careful with information they found in sites such as these since they tend to be forums for personal opinion or conjecture, rather than sources of factual information.

Looking at initial markers can sometimes help us reject a site outright, but more often it alerts us to possible concerns about the Omega Replica Watches legitimacy of information contained in a site. Many sites can look professional and polished, contain a lot of information, and link to legitimate sites (or even do a careful job of documenting sources) but still contain information that is questionable. Looking at initial markers is a start, but we often need additional strategies to evaluate what we read.