ALL >> Art >> View Article
Ma Cannabis Entrepreneur Blasts Municipalities Unfair Collection Practices, Fights "impact Fees"

The Haverhill, Massachusetts cannabis entrepreneur whose lawsuit has shined a spotlight on the state’s controversial law allowing municipalities to collect “impact fees” from cannabis retailers is accusing her host city of unfair collection of the fees.
Caroline Pineau, owner of Stem Haverhill, recently requested that Haverhill Mayor James Fiorentini place the three impact fees paid by Stem since its 2019 opening into an interest-bearing escrow account. Pineau’s request came after the Lawrence Eagle-Tribune newspaper reported that other cannabis retailers in the city had made one or no payments.
“I find this to be an extraordinary, and indefensible, double standard,” Pineau wrote in her June 26 letter, which requested that her three payments remain in escrow until the city “enacts a consistent and equitable impact fee payment or non-payment policy” applicable to all cannabis businesses.
"I also request that the city refrain from all future impact fee collections until a clear and equitable payment policy is in place. I find it disturbing that the city is negotiating on a store-by-store basis ...
... rather than establishing an across-the-board policy that treats all operators fairly and equally,” Pineau continued.
Stem has made three impact fee payments to the Haverhill, totaling $887,487.91. The payments were made on May 28, 2021 ($358,942.53), May 31, 2022 ($328,568.35) and June 1, 2023 ($199,977.03).
The June 15 Lawrence Eagle-Tribune story cited city records showing that the city’s other three cannabis retail shops have paid far less than Stem in impact fees. Full Harvest Moonz has made a single payment of $314,246 and CNA Stores has made a single payment of $176,864. The third shop, Mello, has made no impact fee payments.
Pineau, who filed suit against Haverhill in 2021 in part to force Haverhill to produce documentation of actual cost impacts to the city by Stem’s cannabis sales, said her efforts have generated significant attention to municipalities collecting impact fees without demonstrating actual impacts. Since Pineau began her legal battle, several communities have returned the impact fees or have declined to collect any more fees.
“I’m grateful that my legal efforts have benefited many individual operators and the industry in general, but those efforts have come at a great legal cost borne by me alone. To see that other operators in Haverhill are not being forced to pay the fees while I still am discouraging and incredibly unfair,” Pineau said.
Pineau’s suit against Haverhill is still pending.
Add Comment
Art Articles
1. What Is Recycled Art And Its Purpose?Author: Hannah
2. Systems Integrator For Ai, Nor-tech, Explains Benefits Of On-prem Hpc Over Cloud
Author: Jeanna Van Rensselar
3. Miller & Miller's Sept. 13-14 Auctions Feature Petroliana, Coin-ops, Automobilia, Advertising, More
Author: Ethan Miller
4. Nye & Company Will Auction Historical Artifacts From Rhode Island's Most Storied Families, Sep 10-11
Author: Andrew Holter
5. 2025 Guide: Choosing The Best Professional Product Photo Editing Services Online
Author: Global Photo Edit
6. Le Pho Oil Painting And Items From Tommy Mottola Are In Aces Gallery's September 14 Estates Auction
Author: Alex Fonarow
7. Explore Melbourne Artists In The Form Of Art And Culture
Author: Harry Reinhold
8. Custom Face Bobbleheads Explained
Author: Ryan Johnson
9. Antique Tanjore Paintings – Timeless Treasures Of Devotion & Art
Author: parveen
10. Why Devotees Prefer Ram Darbar Marble Idol For Worship
Author: Riddhi Siddhi
11. What Is 3d Anamorphic Art Design And Tips?
Author: Hannah
12. Unlocking Creativity With Professional Vector Art Services
Author: dream embroidery
13. Understanding Affordable Art And What It Means- An Overview
Author: Harry Reinhold
14. Guide To Selecting A Reliable Marble Moorti Manufacturer For Temples
Author: Triveni Moorti Emporium
15. What Is Anamorphic Illusion Art?
Author: Hannah