Pain Relief With Pemf Therapy

By Author: Admin Manager
Total Articles: 1
Comment this article

The issue of pain management is an extremely urgent health and socioeconomic problem. Pain, in acute, recurrent, and chronic forms, is common across all ages, cultural backgrounds, and gender, costing American adults between $ 10,000 and $ 15,000 per person per year. Estimates of the cost of pain do not include the nearly 30,000 people who die each year in North America from aspirin-induced gastric injury. 17% of people over 15 years of age suffer from chronic pain that interferes with their normal daily activities. Studies suggest that at least 1 in 4 adults in North America suffers from some form of pain at some point. This large population of people in pain relies heavily on the medical community for the provision of drug treatments. Many physicians now refer chronic pain patients to non-drug therapies, ie, "complementary and alternative medicine," to reduce drug dependence, invasive procedures, and / or side effects. The challenge is finding the least invasive, toxic, difficult, and expensive approach.

The ability to relieve pain is highly variable and unpredictable, depending on the source or location of the pain ...
... and whether it is acute or chronic. The mechanisms of pain are complex and involve aspects of the central and peripheral nervous systems. Therapies must be tailored to the specific characteristics of the pain process in the individual patient. Psychological problems have a great influence on whether and how pain is experienced and whether it becomes chronic. The most effective pain management strategies require multiple concurrent approaches, especially for chronic pain. It is rare that a single modality solves the problem.

In recent years, more and more research has been done on a new and fundamentally different approach. This includes the use of magnetic fields (MF), produced by both static (permanent) magnetic fields and time-varying (generally pulsed) magnetic fields (PEMF). Fields of different intensities and frequencies have been evaluated. There is still no "gold standard". Fields selected vary based on experience, confidence, convenience, and cost.
Since there does not appear to be a significant benefit to a single application of MF, largely due to the unpredictability of establishing the true underlying source of pain regardless of the putative pathology, each approach can be used empirically and treatment can be adjusted accordingly. from: the answer. After thousands of patient-years of use around the world, very little risk has been found associated with MF therapies. The main precautions relate to implanted electrical devices and pregnancy and seizures with certain types of frequency patterns in people prone to seizures.

Magnetic fields affect pain perception in many different ways. These actions are both direct and indirect. The direct effects of magnetic fields are: firing of neurons, movement of calcium ions, membrane potentials, levels of endorphins, nitric oxide, dopamine levels, acupuncture actions and nerve regeneration. Indirect benefits of magnetic fields on physiological function include: circulation, muscle, edema, tissue oxygen, inflammation, healing, prostaglandins, cellular metabolism, and cellular energy levels.

Most pain studies use subjective measures to quantify baseline and outcome values. The subjective perception of pain using a visual analog scale (VAS) and pain drawings is 95% sensitive and 88% specific for topical pain in the neck and shoulders and thoracic spine.
The measured intensity of pain (PI) changes with pain relief and satisfaction with pain management. According to a numerical descriptor scale (NDS) and a visual analog scale (VAS), the mean reduction in PI with medical treatment in an emergency room was 33%. A 5%, 30% and 57% reduction in the PI was correlated with a relief of "no", "somewhat / partial" and "significant / complete". If the baseline PI scores were moderate / severe pain (NDS> 5), the PI had to be reduced by 35% and 84% to achieve "partial / partial" and "significant / complete" relief, respectively. Patients with less pain (NDS