Top 3 Myths About Biometric Time And Attendance Systems

By Author: Nick Roberts
Total Articles: 22
Comment this article

The success of a company is directly related to the efficient time management within the company ranks. However, many companies have shied away from using the incredibly advanced technology of biometrics for their Time and Attendance Systems. Greater part of this situation can be attributed to wide spread misconceptions about the new technology. It is in the favour of most companies to embrace the increased accuracy and convenience of a biometric time clock. However, if you are not clear about the efficacy of the product, here are 3 myths about the biometric technology busted with the real facts. The following tips will help you make a much more informed decision.

Costly
The biggest hurdle for any major company decision is the tendency of budget control. Often companies discard decisions for the simple reason of under research and misconception about the actual costs. Now, biometric technology is the latest in time and attendance management systems. The out of pocket costs might be higher than outdated time clock machines. However, you also have to take in to account the costs, which can be avoided if the biometrics ...
... is a part of your company. You can avoid the inherent costs of a time clock machine’s breakdown, the margin for errors and the tendency of employees relying on buddy-punching to cheat the time management system via the time clocks. Biometric machines ensure that the employees are there when the attendance is logged in and this in turn increases office efficiency by more than 60%.

Unreliable
Often companies feel that because of being a more recent technology on the block, Biometrics can often fail to work. While this is true that biometrics is emerging with a lot of edge in today’s work culture, the truth is the technology ids over three decades old. Again, new machines have a fairly accurate scanner with fine sensitivity settings to measure exact biometric data. Most branded biometric machines come with an ultra durable hand plate and finger print scanner to increase the machine’s longevity well beyond traditional time clocks.

Invasion of privacy
Finally, there is a prejudice against the biometric system because it is misunderstood as a possible threat to privacy of employees. While as a rule, office culture is not conducive to employee privacy but biometric technology is not based on any principle that further aggravates the situation. While biometric technology does need to scan your face, hand and fingerprint to match your identity to your company ID, the concept works based on numeric representation. When the company first enrols a face and hand scan for the identification system, the biometric system converts it to a numeric template, which is called upon every time the employee scans for a time log. The fingerprint and face scan in essence is not stored on any of the systems. Thus, the premise for the invasions of privacy does not exist in the first place. However, every individual’s numeric template is different and can only be called upon the right coordinates are scanned via the biometric measurements every time. Thus, the technology provides heightened accuracy.

NTR clocking systems are pioneers in the UK market for biometric time and attendance systems. The company stocks all kinds of time clock machines and attendance management products for current working processes.