123ArticleOnline Logo
Welcome to 123ArticleOnline.com!
ALL >> Politics >> View Article

Fighting The Normalization Of Post-truth Politics - Intentional Insights

By Author: Gleb Tsipursky
Total Articles: 41

Donald Trump’s rally speech in Phoenix on August 22 was full of falsehoods. The lack of outrage over his deceptive statements points to the Normalization of post-truth politics when appeals to personal beliefs and emotions win out over objective facts. To avoid this normalization, we need to borrow the successful tactics of the environmental movement in dealing with the pollution of our environment.

During his speech, according to highly credible fact-checking organizations such as Factcheck.org and Politifact, Trump misled the audience as to his reaction to the Charlottesville violence, such as by neglecting to mention that he blamed “both sides.” He made false claims about the media, for instance that CNN’s ratings went down when they are rising or that the media failed to report on Trump’s condemnation of racism when they did. In the economic arena, he stated that wages “haven’t gone up for a long time,” when actually they’ve risen for at least the last three years. Another example of economic deception: Trump wrongly claimed that the US has “become an energy exporter for the first time ever just recently.”

Where is the outrage over these deceptions?
This is our President, systematically sowing misinformation. Most of his falsehoods – such as the statement about the wages or CNN ratings – had been debunked earlier. Yet he kept repeating them, leaving no other interpretation than a deliberate intent to deceive, the dictionary definition of lying.

This lying is part of a broader pattern: Trump’s Politifact file shows an astounding 49 percent of his statements, is false. By comparison, his opponent in the US presidential election Hillary Clinton’s file shows that only 12 percent of her statements were false, 14 percent for the Republican Speaker of the House Paul Ryan. Despite Trump’s extremely high rate of deception, many still believe him. As an example, 44 percent of those polled believed his falsehoods about Obama wiretapping Trump Tower during the 2016 election campaign.
Thus, many will believe his Phoenix rally claims, despite debunking by fact-checkers. Unfortunately, 29 percent of the public and only 12 percent of Trump supporters trust fact-checkers. This mistrust enables Trump to pollute our politics with deception, undermining the trust so crucial to the political health of any democracy.
How do we stop this pollution of truth by post-truth tactics?
The modern environmental movement is successfully dealing with a somewhat similar problem, namely addressing the physical pollution of our environment. The historical consensus is that the launch of the modern environmental movement came with the publication of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring in 1962. This and other similar publications brought about an awakening of the public to the danger posed by environmental pollution to individual and community health and led to the coordinated movement of activists – Republican and Democrat – fighting for the environment.
The marked difference in the reaction to the two fires stemmed from the launch of the modern environmental movement, combining the coordinated actions of activists to seek out and highlight these problems with heightened public attention awareness of the danger of environmental pollution. We can do the same for the pollution of truth by launching a pro-truth movement. Such a movement would require a coordinated group of activists holding public figures accountable for deception as well as publicly highlighting the danger that post-truth politics poses to the health of our democracy.

By launching a nonpartisan pro-truth movement, we can avoid the normalization of post-truth politics. Doing so will help ensure that the kind of falsehoods uttered by Trump at the Phoenix rally get a response equivalent to the 1969 fire on the Cuyahoga River, rather than 1952 one. Whether the pro-truth movement takes off depends on how many people choose to take the pledge and join the effort to protect the health of our democracy from the pollution of truth and destruction of trust in our political system.

Do you want to read more articles please visit our website: http://ow.ly/1UHI30fe0B3

Total Views: 206Word Count: 647See All articles From Author

Politics Articles

1. Aap Will File A Complaint Against The Prime Minister On Rafale's Case
Author: Manoj Gehlawat

2. Gst Council May Consider Implementation Of Lower Tax Rates For Real Estate
Author: Manoj Gehlawat

3. The Impact Of Social Media On Indian Politics
Author: Hemant Bhagvat

4. Chairman Of Ap Housing Development Corporation - Nallari Kishore Kumar Reddy
Author: Nallari Kishore Kumar Reddy

5. Iran: Teachers Go On Strike
Author: Hassan Mahmoudi

6. Political History Of Imran Khan
Author: urdu talk shows

7. All India Mahila Empowerment Party (aimep) - Educating A Woman Is Equal To Educating A Nation
Author: Unknown Member

8. A Girl Child Is The Pride Of Nation, Educate Her.
Author: Unknown Member

9. Dr. Nowhera Shaik – Life & Times
Author: Unknown Member

10. Telangana Political News: Is Kcr Decision For Early Polls Right Or Wrong?
Author: Unknown Member

11. Nowhera Shaik - A Role Model For Women
Author: Hera Shaik

12. Mep – Hope For Equality
Author: Hera Shaik

13. Telangana Political News- Scenario Of Politics In Telangana
Author: vamshi krishna

14. Social Media Campaign Ideas For Small Businesses
Author: sanjeev kumar

15. Present Scenario Of Politics In Andhra Pradesh
Author: Vamshi Krishna

Login To Account
Login Email:
Password:
Forgot Password?
New User?
Sign Up Newsletter
Email Address: